I have negotiated tens of thousands of points in lawyers contracts, and this has given me a unique view on what is right and what is wrong with the employment space.
The legal industry is in the midst of profound transformation.
While much ink has been spilled on the need to move away from the billable hour, there’s an even more pressing—and often overlooked—shift that law firms must embrace: eliminating non-solicitation clauses from employment contracts.
In 2025’s symbiotic, talent-driven legal market, this change is not just progressive; it’s essential for genuine growth, innovation, and long-term success.
What Are Non-Solicitation Clauses?
Non-solicitation clauses are restrictive covenants that prevent departing lawyers from soliciting the firm’s clients or staff for a set period after leaving.
Their intent is to protect a firm’s relationships and intellectual capital, but in practice, they often stifle competition, restrict lawyer mobility, and undermine trust.
They Reflect an Outdated Power Dynamic
The traditional legal employment model is hierarchical, with firms seeking to “own” client relationships and talent.
Non-solicitation clauses are a legal expression of this mindset. But the world of work in 2025 is fundamentally different.
The psychological contract—the unwritten, mutual expectations between employer and employee—has shifted toward balance and reciprocity.
Lawyers and firms are now equally important to each other’s success. Restricting movement signals mistrust and perpetuates a one-sided relationship.
“A psychological contract helps establish trust and commitment between the employer and employee. Both parties clearly understand what is expected from them and can focus on delivering. Employees who believe their contract is fair… have a sense of belonging and commitment to the organisation.”
Restriction Breeds Complacency, Not Loyalty
Firms that rely on legal restrictions to retain talent may become complacent, neglecting the hard work of building a compelling culture, robust business systems, and genuine loyalty.
If a firm fears its lawyers will leave with clients and staff, that’s a signal to improve—not to double down on barriers.
The best retention strategy is to create an environment where people stay because they want to, not because they are contractually trapped.
Freedom Drives Innovation and Performance
When lawyers are free to leave—and take clients or colleagues with them if they choose—firms are forced to continually earn their loyalty and business.
In my experience, this dynamic creates a positive pressure to innovate, improve service, and invest in people.
It also means that if someone does leave, it’s a healthy signal: they weren’t the right fit, and the firm can focus on those who are.
The Talent Market Demands Flexibility
The legal sector is grappling with a fierce talent war, low unemployment for lawyers, and a growing demand for specialised skills.
Top lawyers want autonomy and the ability to shape their own careers.
Firms that cling to restrictive covenants will struggle to attract and retain the best talent, especially as remote work and global mobility become the norm.
Legal and Practical Limitations
Non-solicitation clauses are only enforceable if they are reasonable in scope, duration, and geography—and courts are increasingly skeptical of anything that unduly restricts someone’s ability to work or compete.
In practice, these clauses often create more legal headaches than they solve, and their deterrent effect is waning in a world where relationships and reputation matter more than paper contracts.
While the billable hour is rightly criticised for stifling innovation and misaligning incentives, changing billing models is ultimately a matter of internal process and client relations.
Ditching non-solicitation clauses, by contrast, strikes at the heart of firm culture and the employer-employee relationship. It signals trust, partnership, and a willingness to compete on merit.
When lawyers know they are free to leave—and free to take relationships with them—they are more likely to stay, perform, and engage.
This is the essence of a healthy psychological contract: both sides give and get equally, fostering loyalty, motivation, and high performance.
The firm becomes a place people choose, not endure.
“The more freedom you offer to your employees, the more likely they are going to stay… With such experiences, trust, and dedication, comes better employee retention and loyalty. This is better for employers and workers alike.”
In 2025 and beyond, the most successful law firms will be those that:
Removing non-solicitation clauses from legal employment contracts would foster a more collaborative legal environment in 2025 by shifting the focus from restriction and protectionism to trust, mutual benefit, and dynamic talent mobility.
Key ways this change would enhance collaboration:
In summary, removing non-solicitation clauses would help law firms move from a defensive, zero-sum mentality to a more open, collaborative, and forward-thinking environment—one that reflects the symbiotic lawyer-employer relationship of 2025 and better prepares firms for long-term success.
It’s time to let go of non-solicitation clauses and embrace a new era of legal employment—one where lawyers and firms are truly 50/50, and everyone wins by choice, not compulsion.
To me, that’s the real revolution, and it matters more than the billable hour ever did.
https://robgreen.substack.com/